Ventilation support

A spinal cord injury (SCI) with a neurological level of injury (NLI) above T12 will result in some degree of respiratory function change. Early assessment will determine predictive factors for respiratory function changes and complications. Frequent monitoring will determine the adequacy of ventilation and sputum clearance, as well as any deterioration in breathing patterns and increase in the work of breathing.

Outcomes will ultimately determine ongoing ventilation and respiratory health needs, depending on the extent of chronic respiratory dysfunction and persistent respiratory risk factors.

Respiratory changes

During the acute management phase, the following key interventions should be implemented to optimise respiratory management:

• ventilation support
lung volume augmentation
secretion management.

These interventions are complementary and should be tailored to the person with SCI’s individual needs. While both ventilation and lung volume augmentation interventions may involve similar elements—such as patient positioning and the use of positive pressure breathing—their roles and application differ. The distinction is defined as follows.

Ventilation support includes use of positioning and mechanical ventilator devices—often continuously—to normalise gas exchange, stabilise the airway, and reduce the overall work of breathing.

Lung volume augmentation includes a range of respiratory techniques and devices—typically in short, repeated treatment sessions—to achieve the therapeutic benefits of deep breathing, support secretion clearance, and promote respiratory muscle conditioning.

The role of mechanical ventilation

Following a high-level SCI, significant hypoventilation may develop due to respiratory muscle weakness and paralysis, affecting the ability to generate normal tidal volumes and access inspiratory reserve volumes. Expiratory volumes and flow rates are also reduced, impacting secretion clearance. Altered breathing patterns develop, as well an increased work of breathing. The combined outcome of hypoventilation is an increased risk of sputum retention, respiratory fatigue and ultimately respiratory failure.

Supine positioning is an important “first-response” and management consideration. This is not only because spinal precautions may be required, but because supine positioning will complement mechanical ventilation to improve respiratory function.

Specifically, when spinal shock is present, supine positioning helps counteract the adverse effects of abdominal muscle weakness, flaccidity and increased compliance on diaphragm positioning and function. Similarly, mechanical ventilation provides positive pressure breathing which addresses the impact of intercostal muscle weakness, flaccidity and increased chest wall compliance. Together, these interventions are complementary, as both correct aspects of the paradoxical breathing pattern and reduce the work of breathing.

The primary goals of mechanical ventilation are to:

  • establish a patent airway, for controlling ventilation and actioning secretion clearance
  • provide support to weakened or paralysed respiratory muscles, especially the diaphragm
    • using positive pressure breathing to correct a paradoxical breathing pattern and drive oxygen into the lungs
    • improving tidal volumes and minute ventilation, addressing hypoventilation
    • reversing atelectasis, improving collateral ventilation and gas exchange of O₂ and CO₂
    • stimulating surfactant production, improving alveolar compliance and reducing airway resistance
    • managing CO₂ retention and the risk of hypercapnia progressing to respiratory acidosis
    • managing secretion retention and the risk of pneumonia
    • reducing the work of breathing and the risk of respiratory fatigue
  • manage the multifactorial risk of respiratory failure (typically occurs between 1-5 days following high-level cervical SCI).

Types of ventilation support

While supplemental oxygen—particularly high flow oxygen—may improve alveolar ventilation and provide a degree of positive airway pressure, typically this will be an insufficient form of ventilation support following a high-level SCI. Rather, mechanical ventilation is typically required for a time, to compensate for the impact of respiratory muscle weakness or paralysis on ventilation.

Mechanical ventilation infers that a ventilator device is used—as well as a circuit and an airway interface—to provide ventilation support.

Invasive ventilators require either an endotracheal tube or tracheostomy interface, while non-invasive ventilation (NIV) devices use a mask or similar interface applied to the face.

Methods of ventilation support
Adapted from SCIRE Professional

Titrated oxygen allows regulation of FiO₂ (selected blend of room air and oxygen), while humidification again improves heat and moisture to the upper airway to improve the mucociliary transport system, as well as reduce mucous viscosity and tenacity.

Specialist units with expertise in SCI management and NIV, may be able to implement nuanced interventions when ventilation support is required for higher NLI. Generalist units will typically need to adopt a more conservative approach, using invasive ventilation and early insertion of a tracheostomy when there is a high risk of respiratory fatigue and failure in the acute phase post-injury.

Invasive ventilation

Invasive ventilation bypasses the upper airway to provide stable airway access for ventilation control and secretion management.

It is therefore typically the most effective means of ventilation support for managing the risk of respiratory fatigue and failure, especially in the presence of an elevated sputum load. However, this requires careful management: specific titration of ventilator settings to optimise ventilation, synchronise breaths with any spontaneous respiratory effort and eventually stage a process of weaning and extubation.

Endotracheal intubation particularly limits independent coughing and speech, as well as the ability to swallow (impairs glottal and epiglottal function). Whereas tracheostomy insertion still provides airway patency, while enabling swallowing and some capacity for expectoration and communication.

Overall, there are no universal, evidence-based guidelines for mechanical ventilation in acute and sub-acute SCI management. While individual intensivists and respiratory physicians will have protocol preferences, general trends in the published literature highlight a range of clinical indicators, management approaches and outcome limitations for invasive mechanical ventilation. These are summarised below.

Non-invasive ventilation (NIV)

NIV delivers positive-pressure breathing and airway support to support ventilation, without bypassing the upper airway.

It therefore preserves the ability to cough, speak and swallow normally—significantly enhancing comfort and communication. NIV also improves synchrony between the device and user, while avoiding potential complications associated with invasive ventilation such as ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), ventilator-induced diaphragmatic dysfunction (VIDD) and laryngeal dysfunction.

NIV devices apply positive airway pressure, so that the pressure outside the lungs exceeds the pressure inside. This pressure gradient drives air into the lungs, improving lung compliance. This has the effect of reducing the respiratory effort to initiate inspiration and therefore, the overall work of breathing. Some forms of NIV also improve tidal volumes, by setting an inspiratory airway pressure (IPAP) which is higher than the end expiratory pressure (EPAP).

In addition to this, NIV helps maintain lung expansion by increasing functional residual capacity—the volume of air remaining in the lungs after tidal exhalation. This residual alveolar air enhances gas exchange and reverses atelectasis.

However, NIV does not permit any direct airway access for suctioning.

Again, there are no universal, evidence-based guidelines for the use of NIV in the acute and sub-acute management of SCI. While practice varies between clinicians, the literature does highlight some general trends regarding clinical indicators, considerations and the outcome limitations for NIV.

NIV support 
Adapted from SCIRE Professional    

Caution

The following factors may prohibit the safe or effective use of NIV:

  • reduced airway protection, including bulbar dysfunction
  • any increased aspiration risk
  • reduced consciousness, comprehension and cooperation
  • severe facial injuries
  • poorly controlled intracranial pressures
  • chest wall, thoracic or abdominal trauma or surgery (e.g. undrained pneumothorax, tracheoesophageal fistula, paralytic ileus)
  • haemodynamic instability or trauma, including pulmonary embolism
  • poor ventilatory status
  • high sputum load and inability to maintain effective coughing over a prolonged period.

Caution

During acute management, NIV:

  • should not delay intubation when invasive ventilation is indicated
  • needs to be trialled appropriately and titrated optimally
  • must only be introduced after establishing baseline measures of ventilation etc.
  • should demonstrate efficacy within 1-2 hours of commencement
  • requires frequent and responsive monitoring, along with adequate staffing and alarm settings
  • benefits from clearly documented risk management and action plans

More information on the best-practice introduction of NIV for the management of acute respiratory failure is here.

Types of non-invasive ventilation

Comparison of CPAP and BiPAP Ventilation
Adapted from SCIRE Professional

Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) ventilation

Bilevel positive airway pressure (BiPAP) ventilation

Mouthpiece ventilation (MPV)

Weaning for extubation and decannulation

Determining readiness to wean from ventilation supports and capacity to manage secretions via a normal airway is very important. This is because both early and delayed weaning and extubation/decannulation increases the incidence of respiratory complications. One recent study reported up to 20% of patients with cervical, motor-complete SCI fail weaning for these reasons.

Clinical guidelines for weaning, extubation and decannulation following SCI are not well established. However, some general indicators and criteria, as well as clinical approaches are suggested below.

Caution

Seek input from experienced SCI clinicians, to guide the weaning process for invasive mechanical ventilation, including extubation and decannulation.

Successful weaning depends on:

  • knowledge of respiratory function and ventilation support in the context of SCI
  • close monitoring and timely responsiveness
  • multidisciplinary collaboration and planning
  • documentation of risk management and action plans.

Discharge and community planning

A person with SCI who has ongoing and significant respiratory dysfunction, will require ongoing ventilation and respiratory health supports for community living. Hospital discharge planning processes will need to address funding, care recruitment and training, as well as establish an adequate network of health professional support. A comprehensive process of trialling and scripting will also be important to supply necessary respiratory equipment and consumables.

For further information, refer to Discharge and community planning.

Resources

Respiratory impairment in SCI (2025)
PM&R KnowledgeNow

Management of SCI complications—Respiratory (2024)
Canadian Spinal Cord Injury Practice Guideline (Can-SCIP)

Best practices guidelines: Spine injury—Ventilator management in high spinal cord injury (2022)
American College of Surgeons

Respiratory management following spinal cord injury (2022)
SCIRE Professional

Respiratory dysfunction after spinal cord injury (2022)
The Miami Project

Physiotherapy management of people with spinal cord injury (2022)
The Australian and New Zealand Physiotherapy Guidelines for people with SCI

Spinal cord injury guidelines: Guidelines for respiratory management following spinal cord injury (2021)
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences

Respiratory management following spinal cord injury: A clinical practice guideline for health-care professionals (2005)
Consortium for Spinal Cord Medicine—Clinical Practice Guidelines

Respiratory education modules and YouTube channel
Canadian Alternatives in Non-invasive Ventilation (CANVent)

A comprehensive guide to non-invasive ventilation (NIV) (2024)
Hamilton Medical

Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) for patients with acute respiratory failure: Clinical practice guide (2023)
Agency for Clinical Innovation

Respiratory education videos in non-invasive ventilation (NIV)
Breas

Mechanical ventilation and weaning protocols (2022)
SCIRE Professional

Tracheostomy decannulation (2022)
SCIRE Professional

References

Abedini, M., Froutan, R., Bagheri Moghaddam, A., & Mazloum, S. R. (2020). Comparison of “cough peak expiratory flow measurement” and “cough strength measurement using the white card test” in extubation success: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, 25, Article 52. https://doi.org/10.4103/jrms.JRMS_939_19

Bissett, B., Gosselink, R., & van Haren, F. M. P. (2020). Respiratory muscle rehabilitation in patients with prolonged mechanical ventilation: A targeted approach. Critical Care, 24(1), 103. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-020-2783-0

Brown, R., DiMarco, A. F., Hoit, J. D., & Garshick, E. (2006). Respiratory dysfunction and management in spinal cord injury. Respiratory Care, 51(8), 853-870. https://doi.org/10.4187/respircare.05185

Denton, M., & McKinlay, J. (2009). Cervical cord injury and critical care. Continuing Education in Anaesthesia, Critical Care & Pain, 9(3), 82–86. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjaceaccp/mkp013

Fenton, J., Warner, M., Lammertse, D., Charlifue, S., Martinez, L., Dannels-McClure, A., Kreider, S., & Pretz, C. (2016). A comparison of high vs standard tidal volumes in ventilator weaning for individuals with sub-acute spinal cord injuries: a site-specific randomized clinical trial. Spinal Cord, 54(3), 234–238. https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.2015.145

Galeiras Vázquez, R., Rascado Sedes, P., Mourelo Fariña, M., Montoto Marqués, A., & Ferreiro Velasco, M. E. (2013). Respiratory management in the patient with spinal cord injury. BioMed Research International, 2013, Article 168757. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/168757

Gong, Y., & Sankari, A. (2022, December 11). Noninvasive ventilation. In StatPearls [Internet]. StatPearls Publishing. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK578188/

Harvey, L. A. (2008). Management of spinal cord injuries: A guide for physiotherapists. Churchill Livingstone Elsevier.

Hendershot, K. A., & O’Phelan, K. H. (2022). Respiratory complications and weaning considerations for patients with spinal cord injuries: A narrative review. Journal of Personalized Medicine, 13(1), 97. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm13010097

Metjian, H. M., & Provost, K. (2022, July–August). Respiratory therapy for neuromuscular disorders. Practical Neurology. Retrieved from https://practicalneurology.com/articles/2022-july-aug/respiratory-therapy-for-neuromuscular-disorders

Peterson, W., Barbalata, L., Brooks, C. A., Gerhart, K. A., Mellick, D. C., & Whiteneck, G. G. (1999). The effect of tidal volumes on the time to wean persons with high tetraplegia from ventilators. Spinal Cord, 37(4), 284–288. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.sc.3100818

Pinto, T., Chatwin, M., Banfi, P., Winck, J. C., & Nicolini, A. (2017). Mouthpiece ventilation and complementary techniques in patients with neuromuscular disease: A brief clinical review and update. Chronic Respiratory Disease, 14(2), 187–193. https://doi.org/10.1177/1479972316674411

Reyes, M. R. L., Shaffer, J., Kwong, C., & Gater, D. (2020). A primary care provider’s guide to managing respiratory complications after spinal cord injury. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil, 26(2), 116–124. https://doi.org/10.46292/sci2602-116

Toki, A., Nakamura, T., Nishimura, Y., Sumida, M., & Tajima, F. (2021). Clinical introduction and benefits of non-invasive ventilation for above C3 cervical spinal cord injury. The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine, 44(1), 70–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2019.1644474

Wiles, M. D., Benson, I., Edwards, L., Miller, R., Tait, F., & Wynn-Hebden, A. (2024). Management of acute cervical spinal cord injury in the non-specialist intensive care unit: A narrative review of current evidence. Anaesthesia, 79(2), 193–202. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.16198

Zakrasek, E., Nielson, J., Kosarchuk, J., & Crew, J. (2017). Pulmonary outcomes following specialized respiratory management for acute cervical spinal cord injury: A retrospective analysis. Spinal Cord, 55(6), 559–565. https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.2017.10